Between the fall of 2006 and the spring of 2010, coffee futures traded in a relatively narrow price range between $1.10 to $1.30. This provided stability to the roaster, the retailer and the consumer for some time.
Suddenly in the late spring of 2010, a steady rise began in the “c” market, culminating in early January 2011 with a interday price of $2.445, amounting to a nearly 80% rise in the market in little more than six months. In addition, coffee differentials, or the “premiums” paid for finer quality coffees, have increased significantly as well. After shrinkage (coffee shrinks when you roast it anywhere between 15–20%), the net result is a roasted cost increase of well over a dollar for most arabica coffees, over $1.50 for Colombian coffees, and several dollars or more for the highest quality varietals.
Why has this occurred? And more importantly, what will be the consequences of this rapid rise? And what is the likely future trend for prices?
Why has this occurred? Speculative interests now use commodity contracts in general, and coffee futures contracts in particular, as a type of investment without any interest in converting the contract into physical coffee. This “speculative bubble” has raised many commodity prices (cocoa, sugar, wheat) in the last year to all-time or generational highs.
In addition, other factors to a lesser degree have also contributed to this price spike, including: increased consumption in such nations as China, India and Brazil; multiple years of smaller crops in several Central and South American countries (particularly Colombia, formerly the world’s #2 producer of total coffee and #1 producer of fine quality arabicas); smaller prior year stocks to offset current year needs; and currency fluctuations in both the dollar and the euro. For the first time in many years, weather conditions in and of themselves have not played the dominant role in the price rise.
There are several potential issues/consequences resulting from this increase. What happens to the price charged by roasters and wholesalers, and in turn to consumers? On the one hand, the logical expectation is that prices will have to increase dramatically to offset raw material increases. And there have been increases in the industry by a number of small and large roasters. And yet at the same time prices have clearly not increased by the corresponding cost increases that should have occurred. Perhaps some roasters/wholesalers were fortunate to foresee this price increase and secured significant lower priced inventory. At the same time, the current economic climate may give coffee sellers at all points in the product chain great pause to raise their prices any more than absolutely necessary. At a recent show in San Francisco, I spoke with multiple retailers who have sold significant coffee volumes in recent years. They acknowledged that the commodity prices had increased and that supplier increases were inevitable. In the face of higher prices, they had decided to “de-emphasize” coffee in their marketing programs, as their ability to aggressively promote (so critical in today’s economic environment) would be compromised.
At some point, every great inventory position comes to an end. And, if coffee sellers are unable or unwilling to adequately raise their prices, roasters/wholesalers will be faced with two less-than-optimal choices. The first choice is to absorb the significant margin hit for some period of time. Companies who sacrifice such significant margin jeopardize their long-term viability. Some companies may attempt to “wait out” the market and hope for a future price decline. This strategy could potentially claim some market players in the coming months in the event that prices remain high (as market players will need significant additional dollars in order to purchase their coffees moving forward). Many companies have attempted this strategy for several months in the face of ever-increasing prices, only to see prices continue to rise.
And the other potential option to address these cost increases in the arabica coffee market is an attempt to compromise the quality of their product with the increased use of robusta coffees. The robusta market, while it has increased somewhat over the last year, has not increased anywhere as dramatically as the arabica market. Currently, robusta coffee typically sells at less than one-half the price level of the arabica contract. While robusta coffees have a distinct taste profile in its pure form, many roasters may attempt to “blend” these coffees into other blends to limit their actual cost increase and ”stretch” their higher price arabicas.
As one discusses this dilemma with many industry veterans, it appears that this latter course is already occurring en masse. Multiple green coffee exporters/brokers have relayed to me that “the companies that will do well are those that can blend the best “and maintain quality taste profiles while keeping cost increases to a minimum.”
Is there something inherently wrong with this latter course? Because price is such a critical factor in the purchasing equation for so many consumers, this course is likely to become prevalent or inevitable. And at the same time, I have great concern that what will occur will be far more than the minor inclusion of a small percentage of robusta coffees, but rather the wholesale downgrading of coffee qualities. At our company, we often “cup” other industry samples in our lab, and have already noticed a significant deterioration in the quality to date. The use of inferior coffees in the 1960s and 1970s led to the significant decline in coffee consumption that occurred (at one point, a nearly 50% decline in per capita consumption from the 1962 highs of more than 3 cups daily). While the recent specialty coffee craze has helped to stabilize and slightly increase consumption, current levels remain significantly below those of previous generations. Current demographic trends (the largest category of traditional coffee consumers are over 60 years old) and the prevalence of other alternative beverages for other consumers (ready to drink teas, waters, etc) limit potential gains as well. Lower quality product in the long-term can’t be a good thing for the industry.
The industry should take all of these issues into account in several ways: (1) everyone must accept some unfortunate increase in pricing in order to preserve the quality that is so crucial to our industry. (2) Retailers and consumers need to be vigilant to insure that their favorite coffee beverage still offers the premium tastes that they have become accustomed to. (3) Coffee needs to continue to be promoted wherever possible (even with challenging margins) so that coffee remains front and center among the essential priorities for every current coffee consumer.
Where are prices headed? As I frequently tell customers, “I left my crystal ball in the car.” But based upon the aforementioned long-term issues, it is unlikely that prices will return to early 2010 levels anytime soon. Even if producers wish to take advantage of these higher prices and plant more coffee trees, it will take several years for the harvests to be significantly impacted. The fundamental issues previously discussed are not likely to change. As consumers have adjusted to gasoline prices that are unlikely to approach $2.50 or less for the foreseeable future, everyone in the marketplace should come to expect, and get used to, significantly higher coffee prices that those that existed for many years. But if we want our favorite beverage to continue to taste as good as the one that has existed for so many years, this could truly be the best long-term future with today’s futures market.
Jonathan White, Executive VP,
jwhite@whitecoffee.com








